- Brand and non-brand, separated. Tighter campaigns gave each segment its own budget, bidding logic, and performance signal, ending the bleed between keyword types.
- Target impression share for brand. Brand terms moved to target impression share to hold placement cost-efficiently.
- Automated bidding on non-brand. Smart bidding on non-brand terms maximized conversion value, free of the drag from over-indexed brand spend.
- ROAS as the leading indicator. ROAS climbing from 184% to 347% confirmed that structure, not more spend, was the variable holding performance back.
Structure unlocks the performance hiding in your account.
How preventing bleed between brand and non-brand campaigns drove 89% revenue growth in month one for a children's subscription brand.

Revenue, month over month
+89%
March alone outperformed January and February combined.
ROAS, month over month
+88%
From 184% to 347%.
Brand spend reduction
96%
Without losing placement.
The approach01
The results02
Revenue grew 89% month over month in month one, and March conversion value beat January and February combined. ROAS rose 88% month over month. Brand spend fell 96% with no loss of placement, freeing budget to scale non-brand, where the conversion opportunity lived.
More work
More results like this.
Your turn
What would this look like for your brand?
Tell us where you are and what you are trying to hit. We will tell you honestly whether we can get you there.
✓
Thanks. Our team will be in touch soon.


